After reading Gloria Amendola's play, Magdalene's
Mind, earlier this month, I was giddy with excitement.
The more I thought about it, the more I liked it. It wasn't too
sentimental, it wasn't too preachy, it didn't try to
explain too many things. The result is a balanced, well-written
drama that occurs in a world with which we can identify.
Taking Magdalene out of 1st century Palestine is probably the best
thing an author can do; while historical works are often compelling,
nothing has grabbed this urban heart like Amendola's modern day
miracle play.
I asked Gloria a few questions in email so Magdalene.org
readers would know a bit more about Magdalene's
Mind.
Whyte: I guess the obvious place to start is by asking what
inspired you to write “Magdalene’s
Mind”, and how you became interested in Mary Magdalene.
Can you tell me a little bit about that ?
Amendola: It was time to write another play.
I was interested in writing about a woman from the Bible. I knew
nothing of who they really were, or could have been. And Mary Magdalene
jumped out at me. With a passion.
Once I began to research her history, it’s as
if she was leading me to more and more information, kindly connecting
the dots for me. And it became an amazing revelation.
Whyte: The drama is well-crafted, which makes me believe
this isn’t your first play. Do you have any other works that
Magdalene.org readers can look for ? Is any of your work available
from a publisher ?
Amendola: This is my third play. My first play
– “There Comes A Time” - was produced at Albertus
Magnus College in New Haven, Connecticut. Some friends were faced
with their senior projects. I owned and operated a fine art gallery
at the time. They asked if I wanted to write something. I did. Then
I became pregnant with my son after its initial run, and refused
an offer to bring the piece “off-Broadway”.
An excerpt from the second play I wrote – “Inside
Voices” – was produced in New York City along with other
new works. After that, I went in a different direction and co-created
two publications in the fields of music and fine arts. I wrote and
published several interviews, developed stories, and edited others.
Mary Magdalene is a return to my roots – theatre.
Whyte: One of the themes that runs through the play is the
childhood relationship between women and their fathers, how it affects
their relationships with other men, and how it affects the way they
relate to the rest of the world. Would you care to elaborate on
this theme a little bit ?
Amendola: Suffice it to say it just became part
of who Sophia and Lydia were. And it seemed as if Magdalene understood
that relationship in each of them. That’s why she realizes
she has to forgive George when she gets there. She held a piece
of her puzzle aside…but it was now time to face her own enigma.
Whyte:. The shift from the Piscean Age to the Age of Aquarius
seems to be influential toward the end of the play. Based on what
the last 2000 years have shown us, how do you envision that this
shift will take place ?
Amendola: I believe consciousness changes when
people listen to speakers and musicians who offer new ideas, when
people read books that offer messages of healing and love, and when
people choose to believe these messages, and hold to these ideas
mentally, spiritually, and emotionally, then a physical shift takes
place. And many people have been following that path. It’s
growing. And it becomes a movement, but more like what we saw after
September 11th. A unity among people. I believe the more we see
new stories in the arts, the closer we are getting to the actualized
Aquarian Age.
Whyte: Although Jesus makes only a brief appearance in the
play, you’ve managed to write him as a very rounded character.
What mental image did you have of Jesus as you wrote him into the
play ? What image did you have of the relationship between him and
Magdalene ?
Amendola: The more I read and researched Magdalene,
the more her feelings for Jesus became apparent. And then I was
startled by the many suggestions of their more intimate relationship
– an idea I had never been exposed to in my Roman Catholic
education. I wasn’t sure how to handle this information. I
decided it was probably an incredible relationship, and it deserved
to be explored without judgment.
So I stayed focused on Magdalene and her feelings emerged.
And as they did, the character of Jesus was a natural realization.
Whyte: The most enigmatic character in the play is The Unicorn.
Can you tell me about what he represents, and why he was always
looking out for Magdalene ?
Amendola: He represents the masculine in terms
of sexuality and its need to protect its beloved feminine. But he
lacks understanding of her depth because he is a creature mired
in the physical body.
Whyte: My last question: why was it so crucial for Magdalene
to be able to forgive, and why did you choose the type of person
George represented ? Granted, I, for one, could probably try to
find more forgiveness in MY heart for people like him, but Magdalene’s
salvation seems to depend on it. Is it the last thing that stands
between her and eternity ? If so, why ?
Amendola: I’m glad you perceived it as
crucial. It is what frees her from the historical injustice of her
name. If her feminine nature is to be the counterpart of the spiritual
Jesus, then she must show that complete forgiveness is necessary
for her emancipation.
The audience or reader must walk with Magdalene here.
George represents the man who competes for success at all costs.
He is the pillar of society with his shadow self attached. He is
the mighty one who betrays all of us sooner or later.
Everyone must forgive the “George” in their
lives.
Magdalene is released from the worldly perceptions
of her history, and can therefore not be separated from her beloved
Jesus, spiritually united as one.
Copyright © 2002 Magdalene.org
All rights reserved. No work here may be reproduced or
reprinted without the express written permission of the author.
Many thanks to Lesa
Whyte for allowing us to reprint this interview.
|
|